South Korean lawmakers have rejected President Yoon Suk-yeol’s martial law declaration, overturning the order hours after it went into effect. The declaration, the first of its kind since 1980, cited alleged threats from “pro-North Korean” elements within Korea’s Democratic Party attempting to destabilize the nation.
In a televised address, Yoon announced sweeping restrictions on political activities, media, and protests. He stated the measures were necessary to protect South Korea’s liberal democracy and ensure public safety. The martial law order prohibited all political activities, regulated media, and required striking medical personnel to return to work within 48 hours.
The declaration faced immediate backlash from opposition lawmakers and civil society. Members of the National Assembly, dominated by opposition parties, denounced the move as a “coup d’état” and called for its immediate repeal. Under South Korean law, martial law can be rescinded with a majority vote in the 300-seat National Assembly.
In an emergency session, 190 lawmakers voted unanimously to lift Yoon’s martial law order, effectively nullifying it. Opposition leaders accused the president of using exaggerated threats to justify an authoritarian power grab. “This was an unacceptable attempt to undermine our democracy,” said a senior opposition lawmaker.
President Yoon defended his actions, claiming they were necessary to counter anti-state forces attempting to destabilize the Republic of Korea. However, critics argued the sweeping restrictions were disproportionate and undermined fundamental democratic freedoms.
The rejection of Yoon’s declaration underscores the deep political divisions in South Korea. While the president warned of threats to national security, opposition leaders framed the move as an attack on democratic institutions. The swift action by the National Assembly highlights the legislative body’s role as a critical check on executive power in South Korea’s democracy.
