Renewable energy projects are facing increasing opposition for their impact on historic sites across the United States. Preservationists argue that wind developments are placing cultural and historical landmarks in jeopardy.
In Idaho, the Lava Ridge Wind Project has been approved near the Minidoka National Historic Site, where Japanese Americans were incarcerated during World War II. Advocacy groups say the project will compromise the sense of isolation integral to understanding the site’s historical significance.
Preservationists nationwide say that wind energy is harming America’s historic sites #ID #RI #WY: A pyramid in Wyoming, lighthouses in New England, and the site where Japanese-Americans were incarcerated in World War II are some of… https://t.co/8KV4F7K2LC #windpower #windenergy
— National Wind Watch (@windwatchorg) December 27, 2024
Rhode Island’s Revolution Wind project, which will place nearly 100 turbines offshore, has sparked a lawsuit from preservation groups. The plaintiffs contend that the project threatens Newport’s historic districts, renowned for their architectural legacy and uninterrupted ocean views.
"Preservationists nationwide say that wind energy is harming America’s historic sites" – Just The News #SmartNews https://t.co/73mtJ1kp2E
— Gene Melius (@gene_melius2) December 27, 2024
In Wyoming, the Rail Tie Wind Project has drawn similar criticism. Preservationists say the project risks damaging sites like the Ames National Monument, a granite pyramid honoring key contributors to the transcontinental railroad. With turbines planned within two miles of the monument, critics argue that the region’s historical integrity is under threat.
Larry Behrens of Power the Future accused renewable energy proponents of turning a blind eye to these impacts. He argued that concerns about historic sites would receive more attention if fossil fuel projects were involved, but are overlooked when tied to green energy agendas.
The Rail Tie Project’s turbines, some of which could reach 675 feet tall, are expected to significantly alter Wyoming’s wide-open prairies. Preservationists have also criticized the lack of transparency surrounding the project’s full scope and impact.
